Graduation Year
2026
Graduation Month
May
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Bachelor of Arts
School or Department
Philosophy
Major
Philosophy
Faculty Mentor Department
Philosophy
Faculty Mentor
Soazig Le Bihan
Faculty Reader(s)
Soazig Le Bihan
Keywords
AZA, ZAA, Sanctuary, Capabilities, Animals
Subject Categories
Applied Ethics | Other Philosophy
Abstract
In my essay, I will be diving into the controversial issue of Animal containment, focusing on zoos in the United States. I will be taking this opportunity to establish a new way of thinking about the argument which states the pros of zoos outweigh the negative effects they have on the animals who live there. Neither side of the argument has a malicious intention towards harming animals. Instead, each side shows a different approach of what it is to properly care, and respect for animal rights. Those arguing in support of zoos commonly reference arguments dating back to Aristotle. However, in my argument against zoos, I will reference instances such as Happy the Elephant who was noted as an autonomous being yet kept in confinement, and visiting the case of Cecilia the Chimpanzee who was awarded person hood in Argentina. I will also be referencing notable philosophers such as Peter Singer and Martha Nussbaum. I will point out that zoos are detrimental to animals’ psychological health, which transfers into their physical health, while simultaneously diving into animal ethics in an attempt to clarify and connect the literature referenced in my essay.
Honors College Research Project
1
GLI Capstone Project
no
Recommended Citation
Tucker Crockett, Jamie Lynn, "The Legal Philosophy Behind Zoos Confinement of Animals" (2026). Undergraduate Theses, Professional Papers, and Capstone Artifacts. 561.
https://scholarworks.umt.edu/utpp/561
Included in
© Copyright 2026 Jamie Lynn Tucker Crockett