Masters Group Int'l, Inc. v. Comerica Bank: Big Bank Loans, the Economic Crisis, Choice-of-law, Impleader, Statute of Frauds, Parol Evidence, Collusion, and the Constitutionality of Montana's Punitive Damages Statute . . . All Bundled into One Case!

Authors

Paige Griffith, Alexander Blewett III School of Law

Abstract

Masters Group International, Inc. (Masters), Third-Party Plaintiff and Appellee, and Comerica Bank (Comerica), Third-Party Defendant and Appellant dispute over a contract. Comerica argues that a proposed forbearance agreement was not a valid contract and Comerica was not liable to Masters under the agreement. Masters urges the Court to adopt the district court’s determination of a valid contract, and uphold all jury awards.

Recommended Citation

Paige Griffith, Oral Argument Preview, Masters Group Int'l, Inc. v. Comerica Bank: Big Bank Loans, the Economic Crisis, Choice-of-law, Impleader, Statute of Frauds, Parol Evidence, Collusion, and the Constitutionality of Montana's Punitive Damages Statute . . . All Bundled into One Case!, 75 Mont. L. Rev. Online 35, https://scholarship.law.umt.edu/mlr_online/vol75/iss1/8.