Bachelor of Arts
School or Department
Political Science – American Politics
Faculty Mentor Department
women, campaign, congress, campaign finance, underrepresentation
Nearly 100 years after gaining the right to vote, women are nowhere near reaching equal representation in the United States Congress. Although this is likely due to a range of factors, the possibility that women remain underrepresented because of a campaign financing disadvantage is explored in this research. While there is a rich body of literature comparing how male and female Congressional candidates finance their campaigns, previous research has not compared the net worth of male and female members of Congress or how net worth affects the amount of campaign receipts a candidate receives. Additionally, the self-financing patterns of male and female candidates and the effect of self-financing on campaign success for each gender have not been explored.
This research addresses these gaps in the campaign finance literature by testing the following four hypotheses: female members of Congress have lower net worth than male members, wealthy members are able to capture a larger amount of campaign receipts than less wealthy members, female candidates rely on self-financing more than male candidates, and females who self-finance earn a lower percentage of the general election vote than male self-financing candidates. My analysis reveals that a member’s net worth is positively correlated with campaign receipts, so I can accept my second hypothesis. However, I must reject the other three hypotheses and conclude that women do not appear to be at a significant campaign financing disadvantage when net worth and self-financing are considered.
Honors College Research Project
Thane, Sara M., "Comparing the Campaign Financing Patterns of Male and Female Congressional Candidates" (2014). Undergraduate Theses, Professional Papers, and Capstone Artifacts. 15.
© Copyright 2014 Sara M. Thane