A Mixed Response to Terrorism in the Middle East

Authors' Names

Natasha K. FordFollow

Presentation Type

Oral Presentation

Category

Social Sciences/Humanities

Abstract/Artist Statement

The threat of terrorism in the Middle East is more than an inconvenience; it is heavily destabilizing, upending political, social and economic structures, leading to unfathomable loss of life, and affecting even the sovereignty of the affected states in the international community. Many attempts to respond to this threat end in frustration and often lead to power vacuums, making room for more radical groups to move in and assume power. This is because these efforts primarily focus on either peacekeeping efforts or military interference. 

I argue that a mixed response is necessary to effectively combat terrorism in the Middle East, tackling both societal and economic problems while including forceful responses to violent extremist groups. The purpose of using this mixed response is to address the immediate concerns of terror and loss of life and stability while simultaneously addressing many of the underlying concerns which serve as the bedrock of radical extremis.

My research looks at the well-known trouble areas of economic and social issues to identify why long-term use of peaceful and peacekeeping measures is necessary. But I will also look at the acute presence of violent, radical groups and explain why forceful military response is necessary at times to promote the development of peace and the protection of life and community. Together, the two “phases” within this mixed response are intended to produce long-term, sustainable security and opportunities for peace and development in the Middle East.

Mentor Name

Professor Karen Adams

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Mar 6th, 11:00 AM Mar 6th, 11:50 AM

A Mixed Response to Terrorism in the Middle East

UC 331

The threat of terrorism in the Middle East is more than an inconvenience; it is heavily destabilizing, upending political, social and economic structures, leading to unfathomable loss of life, and affecting even the sovereignty of the affected states in the international community. Many attempts to respond to this threat end in frustration and often lead to power vacuums, making room for more radical groups to move in and assume power. This is because these efforts primarily focus on either peacekeeping efforts or military interference. 

I argue that a mixed response is necessary to effectively combat terrorism in the Middle East, tackling both societal and economic problems while including forceful responses to violent extremist groups. The purpose of using this mixed response is to address the immediate concerns of terror and loss of life and stability while simultaneously addressing many of the underlying concerns which serve as the bedrock of radical extremis.

My research looks at the well-known trouble areas of economic and social issues to identify why long-term use of peaceful and peacekeeping measures is necessary. But I will also look at the acute presence of violent, radical groups and explain why forceful military response is necessary at times to promote the development of peace and the protection of life and community. Together, the two “phases” within this mixed response are intended to produce long-term, sustainable security and opportunities for peace and development in the Middle East.