Year of Award

2023

Document Type

Dissertation

Degree Type

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

Degree Name

Chemistry (Analytical/Environmental Option)

Department or School/College

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry

Committee Chair

Michael D. DeGrandpre

Commitee Members

Dong Wang, Lu Hu, Matthew J. Church, Robert O. Hall, Jr.

Keywords

carbon, metabolism, model, river, sensor

Abstract

Rivers and streams actively metabolize, emit, transport and store carbon of various forms received from terrestrial environments. Our current understanding of how rivers and streams contribute to the global carbon cycle remains limited, however, in part due to high temporal variability and complexity of inorganic carbon chemistry. In situ autonomous chemical sensors provide powerful tools to observe changes in rivers and streams and enable development of CO2-specific models to quantify riverine processes. In many aspects, our ability to utilize high-frequency sensor measurements remains limited.

This dissertation aims to improve our understanding of inorganic carbon cycling through sensor technology and numerical model development. Following a brief introduction, Chapter 2 to Chapter 5 address four different research questions covering topics of sensor design and model applications. Chapter 6 summarizes research findings and unresolved questions for future studies.

Specifically, Chapter 2 describes the operation, calibration, and performance of an in situ alkalinity sensor, named the Submersible Autonomous Moored Instrument for Alkalinity (SAMI-alk). Co-deployment of three sensors obtained high-resolution alkalinity time series and revealed critical factors, such as river turbidity, that affect sensor performance. Diel cycles of alkalinity originated from evapotranspiration in the Clark Fork River. Chapter 3 reviews the importance of carbonate buffering in freshwater carbon cycle studies by providing numerical simulations and example sensor time-series. Although buffering has been extensively studied in marine science, it is not always properly integrated into freshwater. Chapter 4 uses novel numerical models to infer river metabolism from dissolved inorganic carbon data, which is contrasted with commonly used dissolved oxygen. The new model was tested at three reaches in the Clark Fork River with single station and two station approaches. The difference between oxygen and carbon metabolism demonstrates the uncertainty and complexity of contributions of metabolism to inorganic carbon cycling. Chapter 5 applies the dissolved inorganic carbon model to streams in the Judith River Watershed by adding groundwater fluxes. Processes including gas exchange, metabolism, and groundwater inflows are quantified at three streams with different hydrological connectivity to landscapes from seasonal to inter-annual scales.

Share

COinS
 

© Copyright 2023 Qipei Shangguan