Year of Award

2012

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Type

Master of Science (MS)

Degree Name

Fish and Wildlife Biology

Department or School/College

College of Forestry and Conservation

Committee Chair

Paul R. Krausman

Commitee Members

Kerry R. Foresman, Kyran Kunkel, Mark Hebblewhite

Keywords

behavior, Bison, cattle, first passage time, movement, resource selection, water

Abstract

Temperate grasslands are the least protected ecosystem in the world. In North America, only < 4% of tallgrass prairie, 64% of mixed-grass prairie, and 66% of shortgrass prairie are intact. Historically, grazing played an important role in maintaining prairie landscapes through nutrient cycling and the diversification of vegetation structure and composition. Within grasslands, the plains bison (Bos bison) was the most numerous and influential grazer. However, by 1900 bison were reduced to ¡Ü 1,000 animals throughout North America. Today, bison are scattered throughout their historical range, numbering > 500,000 individuals. Recent questions have surfaced regarding the success of this effort, however, because < 21,000 plains bison are managed as conservation herds (n = 62) and 8% of those herds are managed on areas of > 2,000 km2. In addition, >100,000,000 cattle now graze rangelands in the U.S. and Canada leading to questions regarding the ecological significance of replacing bison with livestock. Our objectives were to increase knowledge regarding the ecological similarities between bison and cattle, and to determine how both species can be managed to mimic ecological patterns that approximate historical bison populations. We used behavioral observations, movement analyses, and Resource Selection Function (RSF) analyses too quantify similarities and differences between the bison and cattle in the Northern Great Plains. We observed a higher proportion of time spent grazing by cattle (45-49%) than bison (26-28%) and a greater amount of time spent at water. We used First-Passage-Time (FPT) analyses to compare the spatial scale of bison and cattle within pastures. We report selection of spatial scales by bison of 1.8 ¨C 9.0 x greater than currently provided. Lastly, RSF analysis identified important resources including selection of water resources by bison. These results have implications when bison are used to meet grazing restoration objectives because water resources may alter grazing regimes important for prairie obligate species (i.e. grassland birds). For livestock, the time spent at water and grazing encourages grazing practices that increase grazing rotation and movement across the landscape. These may include changes in timing and intensity of grazing, and adjustable mineral and water resources.

Download

Share

COinS
 

© Copyright 2012 Michel Thomas Kohl