Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2012
First Page
641
Volume
27
Source Publication Abbreviation
Ohio St. J. on Dis. Res.
Abstract
In this article, the author examines how the process of U.S.-style alternative dispute resolution is unfolding in the Philippines, a former U.S. colony.
Drawing from representative case studies, Part I highlights emerging practices in the global South counter-hegemonic to the fundamentals of U.S.-style mediation.
Part II describes the Philippine community mediation experience, in particular the ideologies, structures, and practices of indigenous dispute resolution, the neighborhood justice system, and court-annexed mediation.
Part III discusses access to justice and self-determination as they relate specifically to community mediation in a postcolonial context.
Using qualitative research the author conducted in the Philippines in 2010, Part IV critiques the implementation of U.S.-style mediation in the Philippines as antithetical to access to justice and self-determination, proposes structural and other practical changes, and theorizes a framework for counter-hegemonic community mediation practice in the neocolonial setting.
The author concludes by arguing that access to justice and self-determination in neocolonial settings requires community practices founded on a substantive normative agenda that collectivizes and socializes conflict, respects and improves upon indigenous dispute-resolution, and recognizes fundamental human rights.
Recommended Citation
Capulong, Eduardo R.C., "Mediation and the Neocolonial Legal Order: Access to Justice and Self-Determination in the Philippines" (2012). Faculty Law Review Articles. 84.
https://scholarworks.umt.edu/faculty_lawreviews/84