Case Summary Citation

697 F.3d 1010 (9th Cir. Sep. 20, 2012)


This case reviews challenges to the Forest Service’s project-level compliance with the Forest Plan’s population viability requirements and environmental assessment for the Angora Project in the Lake Tahoe area. The plaintiffs brought challenges under the National Forest Management Act (NFMA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), governed by the Administrative Procedure Act’s “arbitrary and capricious” standard. The Ninth Circuit affirmed the District Court for the Eastern District of California’s holding that NFMA did not require an assessment of the quantity and quality of habitat needed for the black-backed woodpecker, and the EA was not arbitrary and capricious pursuant to NEPA.

Included in

Law Commons



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.